Gathering supplier performance data in Wichita
Gathering supplier performance data in Wichita

Gathering supplier performance data in Wichita

Geographical Area
North America
Scope
Local
HomeHome
IntroductionIntroductionHow to use this toolkitHow to use this toolkitWhat is Open SPP?What is Open SPP?What our users told usWhat our users told us
PlanPlanEstablish an enabling environment Establish an enabling environment PrioritizePrioritizeMonitoring & evaluationMonitoring & evaluationBuild support and capabilitiesBuild support and capabilitiesCreate an Action Plan Create an Action Plan
ImplementImplementAssess needsAssess needsChoose a procurement methodChoose a procurement methodEngage with the marketEngage with the marketSet sustainability criteriaSet sustainability criteriaPrepare contract obligationsPrepare contract obligationsMonitor implementationMonitor implementation
Open data & measuring progressOpen data & measuring progressOptions for data use Options for data use SPP uptakeSPP uptakeCarbon reductionCarbon reductionGender inclusionGender inclusionLife cycle costingLife cycle costingEconomic DevelopmentEconomic Development
Sector guidanceSector guidanceConstruction sectorConstruction sectorICT sectorICT sector

Resources

Downloadable toolsDownloadable toolsResource directoryResource directoryCase study databaseCase study databaseGuide to ecolabels Guide to ecolabels Open SPP FAQsOpen SPP FAQs
icon
In 2015, Wichita, the largest city in the U.S. state of Kansas, aimed to improve the quality of the city’s parks while reducing costs. At the time, grounds maintenance bid amounts were up 30 percent over the prior year, contractors were not meeting quality standards, and City officials were receiving complaints regarding the height of the grass on playgrounds and playing fields.

With help from the Harvard Government Performance Lab, the city created a data collection tool which inspectors could use in the field to track performance on key indicators (including grass height, prevalence of weeds and property damage). They then conducted a competitive procurement where, for the first time, the City considered factors such as past performance and ability to report on key metrics as part of the vendor selection. The Purchasing Department also divided large land areas into smaller parcels, and reached out to vendors that had not previously bid on the City’s contracts. The new contracts replaced punitive damages for under-performance with a 5 percent performance bonus to incentivize strong performance. Vendors submitted invoices with pictures of the completed work. This eliminated the need for City staff to perform on-site inspections.

With this approach, the city boosted overall competition (the number of vendors submitting responses rose by 38 percent) without raising the costs. What is more important, complaints to the City Manager about grounds maintenance fell substantially.